Skip to Content
Suspect Handcuffed At Parole Office Was Unlawfully Detained

Suspect Handcuffed at Parole Office Was Unlawfully Detained

Generally, if a suspect is held in custody for a crime without either probable cause or a reasonable suspicion that the suspect committed a crime, such a detention will be considered unlawful. Even if a suspect is advised of his Miranda rights in such a situation, any evidence gathered during the unlawful detention may not be admissible in court.

The New York Supreme Court, Kings County case of People v. Rivera involved such a situation, where the defendant was facing felony charges based on an alleged confession.

A Suspect “Not Under Arrest” . . . Is Handcuffed and Held

After a shooting in a multiple dwelling building in Kings County, an informant suggested to a detective that a person named “Joey” might be responsible. The information was based on “what everyone else was saying” in the neighborhood and not on personal knowledge. It was unclear how this led to the defendant, whose name was Jose.

Nevertheless, the detective contacted the defendant’s parole officer and asked for a “parole hold,” meaning the defendant would be held until the detective arrived. When the detective arrived, the defendant was sitting handcuffed to a chair.

The officer told the defendant he was not under arrest, but did again place him in handcuffs and transported him to the precinct in the back seat of his squad car. The defendant was taken to an interrogation room which was bolted closed. The defendant was held in the room alone for more than an hour before the officer read the defendant his Miranda rights. The officer also presented a false photo array that made it appear that the defendant had been identified as the shooter. Shortly after the interrogation began, the defendant admitted he was the shooter.

The defendant moved to suppress the statements he had made to police, arguing that his interrogation was unlawful and even his statements after being given his Miranda warnings were tainted by the unlawful detention.

Was This an Illegal Detention?

The New York Supreme Court, Kings County noted that the police did not have either probable cause or even a reasonable suspicion to hold the defendant; only speculation and rumor. Yet, when the officer told the defendant he was “going back to the precinct,” it was a mandatory direction.

The fact the officer said the defendant was not under arrest still did not mean that a reasonable person would have understood that he was free to leave. In fact, the defendant was immediately handcuffed again at the parole office and escorted in handcuffs to the precinct where he was placed in a locked room. In addition, the defendant had been handcuffed at the parole office for approximately a half hour before the officers even arrived.

Under the totality of circumstances, a reasonable person in the defendant’s position would not have believed that he or she was free to leave, and there were no intervening events before his alleged confession which removed the taint of the illegal detention. Thus, the defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence related to the criminal charges was granted.

Severe Penalties

If you are charged with a serious felony, you may be facing severe mandatory penalties. Selecting the right attorney, who can carefully review the evidence and legal issues surrounding your case, is vital to protecting your rights and freedom. Seek an attorney who can provide you with realistic advice to help you decide how best to proceed in your situation.

Contact Us for Your Consultation

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request & other information using automated technology. Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel. Acceptable Use Policy

How Are We Different?

Lerner & Lerner, P.C. is here to help you get the results you need with a team you can trust.

  • Proven Track Record
    Our attorneys are well-known for helping clients identify realistic legal goals and obtain them. We have successfully handled thousands of cases for our clients and will fight tirelessly to ensure your rights are protected.
  • A Trusted Source
    Kimberly Lerner is widely recognized in the news media as a trusted authority on numerous legal topics. She is a featured legal correspondent on a variety of national news programs.
  • Award-Winning Lawyers
    Both Richard Lerner and Kimberly Lerner hold the AV Preeminent* rating from Martindale-Hubbell, the highest distinction given to lawyers in this prestigious peer review.
  • Former Prosecutors
    Our experience as Former Prosecutors allows us to understand the prosecution’s position against our criminal defense clients and leverage practical solutions. We are also backed by 70 years of combined legal experience.