New York Stop-And-Frisk: A Deterrent to Crime or Racially Discriminatory?

The New York Police Department’s stop-and-frisk policy has recently become a controversial issue among city residents. Under the policy, New York police can stop, question and search anyone on the street if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person is involved in criminal activity, about to engage in criminal activity or is armed.

The department’s policy is based on a 1968 Supreme Court decision that ruled police can stop or question anyone that they suspect might be doing something criminal-even if they don’t have probable cause, which is needed for an arrest. The court held that police only need to have a “reasonable suspicion” that a person may have been (or will soon be) involved in criminal activity to stop and question suspects for a limited time. In addition, the court held that the officer may pat down the suspect for weapons if the officer reasonably suspects that the person is armed.

Under the policy, the number of street stops in New York from January through March 2012 increased to 203,500 from 183,326 during the same period in 2011. In addition, nearly 700,000 people were searched in 2011.

Effective or discriminatory?

New York police and Mayor Bloomberg credit the stop and frisk policy with historically low crime rates. There were 515 killings across the city last year, compared with 2,245 in 1990.

However, the policy has come under fire from civil rights groups, some city council members and minority community leaders. Critics say that the policy has a negligible effect on crime. In support of their point, critics cite statistics saying that 90 percent of the searches did not result in an arrest and of the 10 percent that did, only one percent actually turned up a weapon.

In addition, critics say that the policy discriminates based on race. Police records show that the majority of people who are stopped are male, black or Hispanic. In addition, the records show that the majority of searches are conducted in areas with a high population of blacks.

Supporters of the policy respond by saying that 96 percent of shooting victims in New York are minorities, so questioning suspicious persons in minority communities is justified.

Although the policy has been challenged in many forums at the local level, a federal judge may ultimately decide the fate of the policy. A federal court is expected to rule about whether the policy violates the United States Constitution-specifically the Fourth Amendment which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Consult an attorney

Just because you have been arrested following a search does not mean that the arrest was valid or lawful. Contact an experienced criminal defense attorney to discuss the circumstances surrounding your arrest. An attorney can ensure that your rights are protected and defended to the fullest extent of the law.

In the Media

Watch Attorney Kimberly Lerner Featured on National News Programs
  • Trump Admin Under Fire for Epstein Death
  • Lawyer for Jeffrey Epstein Survivor, Jennifer Araoz, speaks to NBC News
  • Epstein Wants Out Of Jail, A Lawyer For One Of His Accusers Responds | The Last Word | MSNBC

Why Choose Lerner & Lerner, P.C.

We Are With You from Start to Finish
  • Proven Track Record

    Our attorneys are well-known for helping clients identify realistic legal goals and obtain them. We have successfully handled thousands of cases for our clients and will fight tirelessly to ensure your rights are protected.

  • A Trusted Source

    Kimberly Lerner is widely recognized in the news media as a trusted authority on numerous legal topics. She is a featured legal correspondent on a variety of national news programs.

  • Award-Winning Lawyers

    Both Richard Lerner and Kimberly Lerner hold the AV Preeminent* rating from Martindale-Hubbell, the highest distinction given to lawyers in this prestigious peer review.

  • Former Prosecutors

    Our experience as Former Prosecutors allows us to understand the prosecution’s position against our criminal defense clients and leverage practical solutions. We are also backed by 70 years of combined legal experience.

A Team You Can Rely On

Our Father & Daughter Duo Has the Experience You Need

Client Reviews

Dedicated to Client Satisfaction
    Kim was patient/understanding and easy to work with.

    “Professional and knowledgeable, she dissected the situation and researched everything she needed in a matter of minutes. Within an hr after my initial call, she was my representative.”

    - Dan
    There is simply no one else to trust with DWI or other criminal charges in Nassau County than this attorney.

    “Kimberly told me she thought I could get my DWI reduced and and the other charge dismissed or reduced. I was skeptical, but I hired her because I thought she was my best shot at getting out of this alive without a criminal record. She did just that. Months”

    - Rob
    Guided me every step of the way. She's very caring and understanding

    “I was tight on money but she was very patient and never gave up on me. She's a great lawyer and fought for me until I got the lowest penalty. She's extremely informative, reliable and respectful”

    - Yurman
    She is so smart and well respected in the courts.

    “Ms. Lerner handled my situation with such compassion. She is so smart and well respected in the courts. She was able to show the DA the situation without going to trial and my case was dismissed. She does not give up.”

    - B.
    She is so reasonable and will really listen. I strongly recommend her.

    “Kimberly really cares about her clients. She represented me on a DWI case and she really knows her stuff.”

    - Jennifer

Protect Your Future

Contact Us 24/7
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.